Title

body
 
xxx of yyy characters
Physics

Watch this Topic   watch
Messages 

1-8 of 8

Close Topic

Reason

Message



 
Topic: was there previous big bang
if dust,nebulae and other celestial bodies contracted into a ball before the big bang,it means they already existed.
so now my question is how did hey come to being?
Jul 1, 2008
4:51 AM
The idea of the universe contracting previous to the big bang is whats commonly referred to as "The Big Crunch", where the force of gravity overwhelms the distance between the mass of everything, and it all compresses in one singular formation again. In that case, however, it could be assumed that the big crunch to big bang wouldn't have a beginning or an end, making the repetition of events infinite.

At the same time, though, from the evidence based on the speed of travel for matter in the universe, it seems more more likely that that universe will end in a big chill, rather then a big crunch, where all atoms are so far apart, there is no energy between atoms. In that case, the only way you could say how the universe began would be, by some spontaneous event.

Hence, the Big Bang.
Jul 2, 2008
4:16 AM
thanks christoph.
Jul 3, 2008
3:59 AM
the scientists are in 3 bands someones said that will be place of big crunch someothers said big rip and others said big chill! me I vot to big crunch is more raisonable! and U?
Jul 11, 2008
8:16 AM
its not a question of voting!!! for someone this big crunch sooo creepy so for them the big rip is the best name that decribes it ;)
ps:my english is lame
Jul 11, 2008
8:55 AM
boutheina demonica U don't understand me! is not about name but those 3 theory evoke a new version! big crunch# bg bang in it the universe will return one simple point extra dense. the big chill is evolution of universe in such a way the stars will die and will be place to freeze big freeze dark and the big rip is in the evolution continual of detent of universe will evoke a big rip in french " dechirure" and that's the end! 3 theories and the raisonable is big crunch!
Jul 12, 2008
5:20 AM
From what we see, though, the Big Chill seems to be the most plausible version. Theres nothing showing any kind of signs that somehow, gravity will become much stronger, enough to pull the whole universe together again. Everything in the universe is flying away from eachother, and we've never seen any variations on that, so it's only reasonable that the expansion will continue until the big chill.

In that case, though, it goes nowhere towards the concept of how the universe was first formed, and it would give our universe a finite lifetime, meaning that it had to have a reason for it's beginnings. We'd never be able to see how, though, because it's impossible to see what happened before the start of everything around us.

Maybe someday dark matter will further our exploration of the concepts...
Jul 12, 2008
1:15 PM
Because at present scientists are holding on the big bang theory concepts, thats why they are not getting the real past or future of the universe !
Jul 13, 2008
9:06 AM
1-8 of 8


Select Language